This is more a rant than anything else, and a bit faraway from the discussion of hiking, and hiking clothes for ladies. Sure I would love to start a clothing company of my own which would even have it’s own “social mission” so to speak. Clothing corporations objectives are earning money by targeting ladies. In the method the majority of clothing corporations make the world worse for ladies. It is as whether it is an agenda towards girls. In all probability most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing collectively of the apparel item. The few women who're within the women’s clothing design trade apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a trend towards better clothing designs for ladies who need practicality, dignity and operate of their clothes. And that's where the dilemma comes in for a variety of girls who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Girls who just want purposeful, comfy clothes are truly underrepresented . Sure, lots of people would say “Not so. Since a variety of low-rise or pores and skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-short skirts are the kind of clothes that in all probability the majority of women purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means those are the styles that can proceed to be manufactured and moreover these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their method into all varieties of women’s clothes, even those which might be supposed to be for operate not fashion. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so forth. It is not the only clothing firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates trend into function. It brings us again to where we began. As fairly a couple of girls who posted right here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothes for better match, higher comfort, higher freedom of movement and better sturdiness. I might say that normally unisex sizing is one of the best strategy to go with some features that might help accommodate people who might have a bit extra hip or stomach (both men and women). The majority of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are larger even when it comes to “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is not possible. Basically, girls can fit into men’s clothing this manner. The scrubs were provided by the power. I recently was working in a research facility and was required to put on scrubs. I advised her that when it comes to scrubs, a dimension small pant does not match me and it is unusual as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants fit me. The supply individual mentioned she thought a measurement small would fit me. The availability person stated that it's because ladies have hips and men don’t. I instructed her that it seems that quite a lot of small-sized men would find it laborious to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people seem to overlook is that some men do have fairly-outstanding hips and the vast majority of men’s clothes are meant for males with perfectly straight hips. The truth is when males get older, in their 40s they very often develop larger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio industrial for a particular type of Levis jeans which have been meant for older males and it was stated that the options had more room in the hip and thigh. Yet men have a better deal in relation to clothes. Women’s clothing is always made to incorporate fashion moderately than operate. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Publish, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and various different such stores, or on-line shops have some of the better varieties of clothes meant for hiking and other out of doors activities. Brands equivalent to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and varied others. These brands are likely to have the best possible materials, and the perfect options. They have the most effective mixture of fabrics so as to be lightweight as potential for sizzling days and which may protect in cold days with out lots of bulk. They are inclined to have SPF in-built to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a large dimension to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the a part of the jacket that was under the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to wear and just had a very awkward look to it. But, I've seen such absurdly-lower jackets for girls by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to enhance the female kind while being “useful” for outside exercise, or that is what the designers had in mind and yet I must marvel what they were considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and limiting after i moved. I don’t know the way it ever bought manufactured and possibly hundreds had been made and it seemed to be a waste of time and supplies and it seemed as if the “quality control people” missed some major design flaws. I wish I wrote down the model number in order that perhaps I might discover a hyperlink to it in the internet and maybe you all can see for yourself. There are other women’s lively put on that may not be as extreme however which still have enough lack of perform so that almost all energetic ladies just can't use them. The Gap and Old Navy will not be notably for lively put on however they have small line of such clothing. I think that they are terrible in material and design. The Hole, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Target, K-Mart and other such stores, primarily only have clothes product of cotton ( with just a few exceptions). Modell’s is alleged to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries train clothing for ladies which is made by Nike, Addidas (etc) and although these are well-recognized brand names, I discover that they really put a lot vogue into clothes at the expense of operate. They went out of enterprise years in the past however in addition they had clothing for girls that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis where I reside there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-well-identified retailer in lower Manhattan which sells all kinds of outdoor/camping/hiking gear and clothes. There used to be a store in NYC known as Herman’s and one other called Robbin’s. Removed from it. I have seen girls in these stores speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they have regarded in every single place for extra practical designs . There is a company that a variety of you probably have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively put on. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports activities Authority, and some Old Navy’s and It would seem that there are loads of stores that might have something for every lady. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their styles are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas playing sports or participating in rugged outside activities. Why do I all the time discover that the clothes that come the closest to being purposeful and rugged and practical are the ones which are discontinued and replaced by those that aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are actually ineffective. They are meant for girls who have good figures , even who're professional models and the bathing fits are sexist in my view. They might continue a certain style for several seasons or they might exchange the type and never revive it. Why should any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain sorts of designs known as “Grab and Go” which means that the clothes are so practically designed that you would be able to simply seize them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to exercise or do anything else. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as marketed to be. Throughout my life I've gone from store to retailer throughout sure occasions of the yr looking for one of the best rugged and practical clothes for winter or summer season. It's all the time laborious to search out something near what I want. It typically goes for sneakers and slippers and different footwear too. I usually have to take no matter comes closest and that's often in the men’s section. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they had been made the way in which they were.. I as soon as discovered some snug slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd factor was that the soles had been designed with pretty-deep grooves that have been very intently spaced and they had been throughout the only . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the primary piece of clothing that can be touching the ground and going via all kinds of disgusting stuff. I've had a fantasy of designing shoes that are meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to wash. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and but it doesn't work on any form of foot put on like it really works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes manufacturer seen this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and many others) get stuck in the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the fixed and intense rolling of the tires means that quite a lot of the debris will likely be hurled off. No human can create that form of physical drive to repeatedly drive the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way in which that the grooves are designed it only makes the soles laborious to clean. It signifies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots will be filled up with debris and wouldn't assist a lot in serving to the wearer to effectively climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to enable the wearer to climb. It appears to me that if the soles are manufactured from https://www.evernote.com/shard/s454/sh/e8e05cdf-675d-b3d4-16f8-890edb667aa3/38c50c28619f609d61dcb8ee395b2cec rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that solely accumulate dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians working on a greater form of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it might make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of footwear. I've noticed some unusual designs that do not contribute to operate. It appears to me that grooves are just placed on the soles of sneakers for trend functions. This goes for sneakers too. Plenty of sneakers which can be good in design in other methods, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such sorts of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are these with drawstrings. In fact I'm not an knowledgeable in making sneakers or shoe-soles and i could possibly be fallacious , but I'm sufficient of an skilled in wearing shoes meant for energetic lifestyles and I feel that quite a lot of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the flawed factor. I wonder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the back of the pants waist area. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I believe it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the aim of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in shops comparable to Okay-Mart and Goal where there are a big variety of women’s underwear. It is difficult to seek out the type of briefs that the majority of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my view. I want consolation, durability and simple-care. All that does not speak for me. Something that will get stuck you-know-where is unacceptable. I've been in the underwear part of malls and different stores (I need to admit I never seemed in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t expect to find anything practical there), and I have seen older women trying to find one thing that is age-acceptable and dignified and , once more, practical. There may be little apart from those hi-cuts. See one of many links below for an article about the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” will not be modest enough. It seems it has at all times been about bodily limiting girls. That’s the way I have a look at it. Also one of many hyperlinks under result in an article about how there will likely be a women’s like of clothes which might be inspired by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It means that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have found to what I choose is a sure Jockey model brief “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher sort of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone more simply . I need to order a size bigger than I usually would so that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t understand the actual function of “athletic bras” the way in which they are designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I really don’t in any case, and that i don’t care). Bras meant for energetic lifestyles ought to hold them in, nothing extra. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some feminine runners who appear to be top heavy and nonetheless they're very fast however I'm wondering if they are going to develop back issues later in life. I do know that I may not be addressing the wants of women born with sure sizes, or who have special wants reminiscent of after surgery, however sport bras needs to be made to have sufficient comfy tension to prevent bouncing. There may be a need for bras that do what some jock straps are alleged to do. I would like to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the best space that may make bras pointless. It could be great for hotter weather and for simplicity, so you don’t must hassle with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Simply keep “them” from moving. Simply slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you'll exit to walk , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a thing? I believe I mentioned in one in every of my earlier posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for girls known as Solar Pant. I am positive a variety of girls would want such kinds of clothing. I then installed an elastic band to offer extra tension because the waist band could be a bit too large in any other case, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved cutting into the back of the waistband space because the drawstring was sewn into that area. It is vitally sensible for a number of actions. It is not so long that the hem drags on the ground. It's not for very very hot weather but that may depend by yourself skill to tolerate hot weather. It's of a cloth mix that isn't like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, but typically the way in which the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I find it's a really particular person thing. That is how most hiking pants ought to be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for very hot weather very much like the unique Coolibar Sun Pant. It is meant for use with a belt but I find that I don’t need one to put on this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that is for men, but which suits nicely and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of many final two hyperlinks below). It stretches a bit so it doesn't get tight while you bend or move. Of course not everybody has the identical figure as I accomplish that others may need a distinct opinion. However generally this is an efficient type of pant . When you do like it you must write to the company and inform them to grasp on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so because the openings are slits nearly fully parallel with the waist. I feel they are going to discontinue it so you may want to provide it a try. The fabric stretches so it's not as bad as if it had been with jeans with these kinds of pockets. It's an impractical design and i don’t know why clothes designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets you must maneuver your palms in a extra unnatural approach and even raise the hem of your shirt to place your arms in your entrance pants pockets. It needs to be for model, nothing else. Pockets needs to be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too shut will know what I mean. However generally zippers can cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you put your fingers in. There's a need to design zippers of non-scraping material for this objective. There can also be another men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I mentioned them earlier than (see one in all the 2 hyperlinks below). Why aren’t any clothes designers engaged on this? They're of a good material for hot days, however for me, I found myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band in the again of the waistband area so as to make the belt unnecessary. I trip a bike. I not often use shorts even after i jog. However again, I need to settle for no matter comes close to what I want. I got here across a running brief called Brooks Sherpa IV. I tend to simply go to clothing stores to look at designs and materials . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I just wondered why regular lengthy pants aren't fabricated from such a cloth. It can be wonderful for a hiking pant meant for highly regarded weather. The material was very very like a really very lightweight softshell. There may be one from the North Face known as The Prolix jacket. I like softshell clothing. It is extremely lightweight, not excellent for cold weather by itself however you can put layering beneath it. It is flexible and suits excellently and permits freedom of motion. However softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer season. Additionally , why aren’t there any really really practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an amazing summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I discover myself wishing for such a factor. It doesn't exist. Why not make certainly one of lightweight and stretchy material? I do know that I've said to a lot on this publish. I'll cease for now. I hope I did not bore anybody. I've lots of concepts for the better design of clothing and I'll in all probability post once more with my ideas until I am instructed not to. I may have been a bit political too.
